July
11, 2002
ALERT:
Gramm Amendment Would Undermine Impartiality of Audits
Vote
NO on Creating a Small Firm Exception to Auditor Independence
Rule
Dear Senator:
Senator
Phil Gramm intends to offer an amendment to S. 2673 that would
seriously undermine not only that bill's provisions to enhance
auditor independence, but existing public policy that demands
an independent audit for all public companies. As such, it
runs counter to the whole thrust of the audit reform legislation
and would seriously compromise the quality of small company
audits.
At a
time when Congress is looking to enhance the independence
of the audit, the Gramm amendment would create a broad new
exemption from auditor independence rules for small companies.
Specifically, it would permit the auditing oversight board
created by the Senate bill to exempt whole classes of companies
and audit firms from the rules that limit the consulting services
that auditors may provide to their audit clients. Not just
the Securities and Exchange Commission, but the accounting
profession itself, has never granted a small-firm exemption
from the auditor independence rules. Thus, the proposed amendment
would be more lenient even than the existing rules of the
profession.
While
recent attention has focused on the audit failures at major
corporations, just over half the financial statements required
to be restated between 1997 and 2001 were from companies with
under $100 million in revenues. Clearly, we need to be strengthening
the audits of these companies, not eliminating existing protections
that minimize auditor conflicts of interest.
In promoting
the amendment, Sen. Gramm has suggested that it is needed
to provide the new auditing oversight board with flexibility
in implementing the independence rules. However, the bill
already gives the board ample flexibility with its provision
permitting the board to grant exemptions on a case-by-case
basis. The board should not be given the "flexibility"
to open up gaping new loopholes in auditor independence rules,
as this amendment would allow.
Lack
of independence in the independent audit is a common thread
in the recent accounting crime wave. We urge you to vote no
on this anti-investor amendment.
For more
information contact Travis Plunkett at the Consumer Federation
of America at 202-387-6121.
Sincerely,
Barbara
Roper
Director of Investor Protection
Consumer Federation of America |
Scott
Harshbarger
President
Common Cause |
Kenneth McEldowney
Executive Director
Consumer Action |
Frank Torres
Legislative Counsel
Consumers Union |
Edmund
Mierzwinski
Consumer Program Director
U.S. Public Interest Research Group